Advocacy
All-Electric Building Mandate (AEBA)
The All-Electric Building Act is an electrification mandate that applies to most new residential buildings up to seven stories and prohibits the use of fossil fuel–burning equipment, including gas stoves, fireplaces, and propane systems. The mandate was originally scheduled to take effect on December 31, 2025.
Enforcement has since been formally delayed by New York State as a result of ongoing litigation and extensive advocacy led by the New York State Builders Association and its plaintiff partners. The State has agreed to pause implementation until a mid-level federal appellate court issues a ruling, with the delay extending further if the case proceeds to the U.S. Supreme Court.
LIBI’s Position
LIBI supports a pause in implementation so the State can assess electric grid readiness and understand the real cost impacts on housing before moving forward. Based on warnings from NYISO, LIBI believes grid reliability, particularly on Long Island, must be addressed first. A delay allows time to strengthen transmission, add reliable zero-emission generation and storage, and align energy policy with the urgent need to keep housing production affordable and moving.
LIBI opposes moving forward with the mandate before the grid is prepared and without a clear plan to address housing impacts. Premature implementation risks higher construction costs, project delays, and reliability issues during peak demand, all of which ultimately fall on homebuyers, renters, and local governments. Push mounts for delay in 'all-electric' requirement for new buildings, now set to take effect in January Reports: Aging plants, high demand may threaten NYS electricity reliability NYS in legal filing says it is delaying Jan. 1 start for 'all-electric' building mandate.
Scaffold Law (Labor Law §§240 & 241)
New York’s Scaffold Law is a 140-year-old outlier that imposes absolute liability on property owners and contractors for gravity-related injuries, regardless of fault or safety compliance. Unlike every other state, courts are prohibited from considering whether proper safety equipment was provided, whether protocols were followed, or whether a worker’s own actions contributed to an accident.
This standard has significantly inflated construction costs. Insurance premiums in New York are 5–10% higher than the national average and can consume up to 12.5% of total construction budgets—more than five times higher than in neighboring states. These costs
disproportionately impact residential construction, renovations, and small-to-mid-sized projects, which dominate Long Island’s building activity. The added costs are passed on to homeowners, renters, taxpayers, and municipalities, worsening affordability and slowing redevelopment.
The law also inflates public infrastructure costs, diverting taxpayer dollars away from classrooms, roads, and housing. Insurance premiums on major public projects have increased by hundreds of millions of dollars solely due to Scaffold Law exposure.
Fraud and Abuse Concerns
The absolute liability standard has created incentives for staged and exaggerated accident claims. Recent federal litigation alleges coordinated schemes involving repeat claimants, referral networks, medical providers, and litigation funders. Because owners and contractors have virtually no legal defense under the law, insurers are often pressured into large settlements, driving up costs and rewarding abuse.
LIBI’s Position
LIBI supports common-sense reform that replaces absolute liability with a comparative negligence standard while fully preserving worker safety. Courts should be allowed to consider whether safety equipment was provided, available, and properly used. This reform would align New York with the rest of the country, reduce abusive litigation, stabilize insurance costs, and ensure that resources are spent on building and safety—not excessive insurance payouts. Scaffold Law report: Insurance costs skyrocket up to 500% in NYS because of controversial law Proposed NY State bill would exempt Long Island construction projects from Scaffold Law Time to deconstruct outdated Scaffold Law An old law, new scams and spiking insurance rates that can cost Long Island and New York State residents Reform the Scaffold Law and cut the cost of building in NY Lawsuit: Long Islanders participated in alleged fraud scheme to stage fake accidents Scaffold Law Reform
Scaffold Law report: Insurance costs skyrocket up to 500% in NYS because of controversial law
Proposed NY State bill would exempt Long Island construction projects from Scaffold Law
Time to deconstruct outdated Scaffold Law
Reform the Scaffold Law and cut the cost of building in NY
Lawsuit: Long Islanders participated in alleged fraud scheme to stage fake accidents
Prevailing Wage
New York’s prevailing wage law requires workers on certain construction projects to be paid wages and benefits set by the State, typically based on union collective bargaining agreements
rather than local market conditions. Historically, prevailing wage applied primarily to publicly owned and funded projects.
In recent years, the State expanded prevailing wage to privately owned projects receiving public assistance. Currently, private projects over $5 million are subject to prevailing wage if public funding accounts for at least 30% of total construction costs, with determinations made by the Public Subsidy Board. Proposed legislation would significantly expand this framework by lowering the threshold to 20% and eliminating the Public Subsidy Board entirely, making prevailing wage automatic for a much broader range of private projects.
LIBI’s Position
LIBI supports fair wages and a balanced approach that preserves housing and infrastructure feasibility. LIBI supports maintaining the current 30% threshold and preserving the Public Subsidy Board to allow for project-specific review rather than automatic application.
LIBI has warned that expanded prevailing wage requirements can increase construction costs by 30%–60%, rendering many residential, mixed-use, and infrastructure projects financially infeasible. In a region already facing a housing shortage and high land, material, and financing costs, these increases would slow production, reduce competition, and push investment out of Long Island and New York State.
LIBI opposes lowering the threshold and eliminating safeguards that ensure thoughtful, case-by-case determinations. When projects become infeasible, they do not get built—impacting workers, renters, homebuyers, and municipalities alike. Prevailing-wage bills in Albany threaten construction projects, jobs LI developers: 'This can't happen'
Residential Fire Sprinkler Mandate
The New York State Fire Prevention and Building Code Council has considered proposals to mandate automatic fire sprinkler systems in all newly constructed one- and two-family homes. New York already requires builders to disclose the availability, costs, and benefits of sprinkler systems so homebuyers can make informed decisions.
During the most recent code update, the Council reviewed the proposal and ultimately removed it, keeping residential fire sprinkler systems optional for new one- and two-family homes under three stories.
LIBI’s Position
LIBI supports strong fire safety standards grounded in data and real-world outcomes. This
includes working smoke and carbon monoxide detectors, modern building and electrical codes, and responsible enforcement of existing safety requirements. LIBI supports transparency and consumer choice, which current disclosure requirements already provide.
LIBI opposes a blanket sprinkler mandate for one- and two-family homes. Builders estimate such a requirement would add $20,000–$30,000 per home, increasing prices by 3–5% at a time when affordability is already strained. Home prices have risen over 41% since 2019, and the median new home price now exceeds $600,000—well beyond the reach of most New York families.
Data shows that fire fatalities overwhelmingly occur in older housing stock, while there have been no reported fire fatalities in new one- or two-family homes built after 2000. Rather than imposing an unfunded mandate with limited safety benefit, LIBI believes the State should focus on enforcing existing safety measures, improving protections in older homes, and preserving consumer choice.
Long Island builders oppose potential NY fire sprinkler rule, citing housing affordability Fire sprinkler proposal sparks affordability debate